Again, pretty much all of you guys who disagree entirely missed the point of the video. But here's a question for you all: Guys, please actually WATCH and LISTEN to the video before commenting. It's almost as if NONE of you are even watching, like you're ignoring everything said. I AGREE with the Mountain Man and his anti-government sentiments. I'm an anarchist, for god's sake, and agree that the government is a tyrannical parasite. I'm NOT debating that in the video, so actually LISTEN to the video before assuming I 100% disagree with the Mountain Man. Holy crap, I've never seen so many people just ignore that actual content of a video. Shocking levels of blind assumuptions, which truly brings into question the validity of your views.
But now, a question I've not gotten an answer to, or at least not a disagreement on: is there a difference between subservience to laws imposed by the government, and subservience to "natural" laws imposed by god? My point is that assuming "god's laws" are somehow ultimate, or that we should not also rebel against god's laws, simply because god is the most powerful being in the universe, seems like a form of submission to power -- similar to submitting to the power of government. Why is it that rebelling against government laws is justified (in the case of the Mountain Man), but rebelling against god's laws is NOT justified?
Watch the Original Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LwR0c-CE5g
Join the Red Pill Forums: http://www.redpill.boards.net
Red Pill on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/RedPillPhilosophy
Follow Me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/RedPillTweets
Cool Shirts: http://www.redpillphilosophy.com/store
Become a "Red Pill Member" for Exclusive Content: http://www.redpillphilosophy.com/Members
My FREE Newsletter: http://www.redpillphilosophy.com
Montana mountain man, Ernie Wayne Tertelgte, corporate fiction, court, universal law, natural law, fishing without a license, constitution, Federal Reserve, conspiracy, Illuminati, Chris Delamo
