Targeted Individual Gang Stalking MKULTRA Mind Control John Hall Microchip AI Transhuman CIA CSIS

   

Shad Budge Productions

 

Published on Jul 18, 2018

Targeted Individual Gang Stalking MKULTRA Monarch Mind Control Dr. John Hall Microchip Artificial Intelligence Transhumanism CIA RCMP CSIS Disinformation Fake News Propaganda Mind Reading Direct Neural Interface Brain Implant

***NOTE*** This is the full version of the documentary. You can watch the short version here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t20sR34YWcQ

If you watched the short version already, skip the introduction.

0:00 - Introduction
1:54:42 - Your government just wants the best for you!
2:42:23 - Disinformation, fake news, propaganda, character assassination
3:20:07 - Targeted individuals (whistleblowers, doctors, victims, patents, laws, precedence, etc)
6:05:22 - Mind reading technology, brain implants, direct neural interfaces
7:25:28 - Artificial Intelligence
7:59:01 - Transhumanism
8:22:13 - MKULTRA (they totally stopped research and development on this in 1973, and will never attempt it again...)
9:42:10 - Conclusion

I made this documentary similar to a basic essay. Both the introduction and conclusion highlight the key factors and main points of the targeted individual/human experimentation subject, but do not cover all the details associated. The body of the documentary dives deep into the details of all the specific areas that are discussed. Technically speaking one could just watch the body of the video and still have access to all the information presented. Due to the vast amount of information regarding this subject I deduced it was most effective to have an introduction and conclusion highlighting the most vital clips. I am aware the length of this documentary is very long, but keep in mind I have done thousands of hours of research regarding this subject and I would rather over inform the viewers as opposed to under inform them.

PLEASE sign our petition in support of the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill here: http://chng.it/pkCvhRMS

Watch our latest video describing the bill here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gFLBrd3vuIw

Our website: http://www.globalneuroethics.com

Our GoFundMe campaign: https://www.gofundme.com/global-neuroethics-conference

Please help us enact the Neuro-Specific Human Rights Bill into legislation by sharing the links above on all social media platforms!

Rapid advancements in human neuroscience and neurotechnology open unprecedented possibilities for accessing, collecting, sharing and manipulating information from the human brain. Such applications raise important challenges to human rights principles that need to be addressed to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. This proposal assesses the implications of emerging neurotechnology applications in the context of the human rights framework and suggests that existing human rights are not sufficient to respond to these emerging issues. After analysing the relationship between neuroscience and human rights, we identify four new neuro-specific human rights that will be vital in the effort of protecting the human brain: the right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity.

The volume and variety of neurotechnology applications is rapidly increasing inside and outside the clinical and research setting. The ubiquitous distribution of cheaper, scalable and easy-to-use neuroapplications has the potential of opening unprecedented opportunities at the brain-machine interface level and making neurotechnology intricately embedded in our everyday life. While this technological trend may generate immense advantage for society in many ways, its implications for ethics and the law remain largely unexplored. We argue that in the light of the disruptive change that neurotechnology is determining in the digital ecosystem, the normative terrain should be urgently prepared to prevent misuse or unintended negative consequences. In addition, given the fundamental character of the neurocognitive dimension, we argue that such normative response should not exclusively focus on tort law but also on foundational issues at the level of human right law.

The freedom of thought, freedom from slavery, torture and inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment are regarded by international human rights law as not subject to any exceptions and, therefore, as absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be limited for any reason. No circumstance justifies a qualification or limitation of absolute rights. Absolute rights cannot be suspended or restricted, even during a declared state of emergency. The right to cognitive liberty, the right to mental privacy, the right to mental integrity, and the right to psychological continuity should also be enacted into law as absolute rights.


  AutoPlay Next Video