TEST THE TESTS:
Two weeks ago, I called the FDA to find out more about the PCR test that are inherently FAULTY. They are worthless, deceptive, useless diagnostic tests, rendering case numbers meaningless.
Get that?
Also, they are not FDA-approved. Not that this REALLY makes a difference, given that many products that are approved come with risk. Regardless it is important to make the distinction that these tests are ISSUED under Emergency Use Authorizations for Medical Devices. This ostensibly means that corners can be cut.
The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) authority allows FDA to help strengthen the nation’s public health protections against CBRN threats by facilitating the availability and use of MCMs needed during public health emergencies.
Under section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the FDA Commissioner may allow unapproved medical products or unapproved uses of approved medical products to be used in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by CBRN threat agents when there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.
When i called two weeks ago, there was ONLY one test. The CDC test which revealed many false positives. Last week there were six tests. NOW there are 15 tests.
Go here to see them: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/emergency-situations-medical-devices/emergency-use-authorizations#covid19ppe
What is the golden standard?
Let's look to others regarding these tests. Once you REALIZE they are useless, then the conversation should end there. BANG
From Sayer JI of Green Media Info:
"When they're talking about testing and knowing that PCR can pick up RNA levels but doesn't have specificity, there's just no way that the testing could actually do anything but generate a false positive."
Dr. Thomas Cowan: "The guy who invented the test, they're using with Coronavirus called an RTPCR test said, unless you have a gold standard, like the meningococcal, you cannot use this for diagnostic purposes. It's a surrogate test. But the people who have quote Coronavirus, they have a fever and a cough, could be anything, they haven't isolated the virus. And some of the people who have a fever to cough have a virus. And some of the people who have the virus have nothing. And so you can't make any prediction as to whether a looking for a piece that's supposedly unique to the virus has any comment on whether they are actually sick from that. The really scary part of this is the way the test is done. And they take a piece that's supposedly unique to that virus. And they accentuate it through cycles, 20 cycles, 40 cycles. Cause they can't find it just with one. And if you get it up to 60 cycles, you find it with everybody. So it's not unique to that virus. So, but if you do it 35 cycles and you don't find it with anybody, so you can actually, by choosing the number of cycles, choose how many people will test positive."
From Jon Rappaport:
Here is a CDC paragraph about results. I suggest you read it several times.
"Positive [test] results are indicative of active infection with 2019-nCoV but do not rule out bacterial infection or co-infection with other viruses. The agent detected may not be the definite cause of disease. Laboratories within the United States and its territories are required to report all positive results to the appropriate public health authorities."
I'm going to blow past the blatant contradiction in that CDC paragraph and cut to the chase.
The key line in that paragraph is: "The agent detected [the coronavirus] may not be the definite cause of disease."
40:17
