Fire & Fury hatchet job on Donald Trump, #FakeNews like 9/11 criminal Mueller's Russiagate

   

PublicEnquiry

 

Published on Jan 9, 2018

Michael Wolff's 'Fire and Fury': Some of the facts just don't stack up
President Donald Trump isn't the only one who thinks Michael Wolff doesn't get all the facts right in his bombshell book "Fire and Fury."
New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman, and a few others, also point out some discrepancies in the book.
Wolff defends the book's accuracy, telling NBC: "I am certainly and absolutely in every way comfortable with everything I've reported in this book."
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/07/michael-wolffs-fire-and-fury-some-of-the-facts-just-dont-stack-up.html

Michael Wolff's 'Fire and Fury': Some of the facts just don't stack up Michael Wolff's 'Fire and Fury': Some of the facts just don't stack up
21 Hours Ago | 00:47
"Michael Wolff is a total loser who made up stories in order to sell this really boring and untruthful book," President Donald Trump says about the author of "Fire and Fury."

He's not the only one to challenge assertions in the tell-all book, which has shaken the White House with accounts and quotes from current and former Trump administration officials.

New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman, and several other journalists and Washington insiders, do as well.

"I believe parts of it, and then there are other parts that are factually wrong," Haberman said Friday on CNN. "He believes in larger truths and narratives. So he creates a narrative that is notionally true, that's conceptually true. The details are often wrong."

In one example, she pointed out that the book says Rupert Murdoch called Trump "a f-----g idiot," but in a column, Wolff quoted Murdoch as saying Trump was "a f-----g moron."

She also noted that Wolff said CNN had published an unsubstantiated dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele about Trump's alleged dealings with Russians. The dossier, however, was actually published by Buzzfeed.com.

"That's ... one fact check away from getting it right," she said.

According to vox.com, the book claims that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's staff had rejected a reconciliation meeting in August on grounds that the senator was getting a haircut. At the time, Trump was furious with McConnell over the Senate's failure to repeal and replace Obamacare.

McConnell's deputy chief of staff, Don Stewart, denied the report on Saturday.


STEW 🇺🇸🐶
@StewSays
I can confirm: this never happened. Neither the author nor vox bothered to check. https://twitter.com/ashleyrparker/status/949712918635048960
9:24 PM - Jan 6, 2018
4 4 Replies 10 10 Retweets 16 16 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In another error, the book says Washington Post reporter Mark Berman was in the Four Season restaurant the morning Ivanka Trump showed up for breakfast. Berman, however, says he wasn't there.
On Twitter, Trump claimed he "authorized Zero access to White House" for Wolff and "never spoke to him for book."


Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump
I authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to him for book. Full of lies, misrepresentations and sources that don’t exist. Look at this guy’s past and watch what happens to him and Sloppy Steve!
3:52 AM - Jan 5, 2018
44,924 44,924 Replies 24,010 24,010 Retweets 100,415 100,415 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
In an interview on NBC's "TODAY" on Friday, Wolff insisted that he had spoken with Trump for the book.

"Whether he realized it was an interview or not, I don't know, but it certainly was not off the record," he said. "My window into Donald Trump is pretty significant."

Wolff also defended the book's accuracy.

Michael Wolff
Courtenay Brown | CNBC
Michael Wolff
"I work like every journalist works so I have recordings, I have notes," he told the "TODAY" show. "I am certainly and absolutely in every way comfortable with everything I've reported in this book."

Wolff says in the introduction that many of the accounts "are in conflict with one another" and may be "badly untrue," according to thehill.com. He goes on to say he "settled on a version of events" he thought were true.

Others, including CNN's Brian Stelter, noted a string of flattering stories Wolff had written in The Hollywood Reporter about Trump in June 2016, five months before the election; and about top aides Steve Bannon two weeks after the election and Kellyanne Conway just after the inauguration.

"Wolff seems to have been warming up his sources for the book," Stelter said on CNN's "Reliable Sources."



Reliable Sources

@ReliableSources
Audacious journalism, shoddy writing or both? @brianstelter discusses Michael Wolff's "Fire and Fury"
5:01 PM - Jan 7, 2018
38 38 Replies 33 33 Retweets 76 76 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Wolff conceded as much in the "TODAY" show interview.

"I certainly said what was ever necessary to get the story," he replied when asked if he had flattered his way into the White House.


  AutoPlay Next Video