Trump Should Call Witnesses To Expose Anti-Trump Officials At The Highest Levels To America

   

Conservative Resurgence

 

Published on Jan 25, 2020

Now more then ever we need your help keeping this channel producing REAL content for REAL people
https://www.paypal.me/ConservativeResurge

Conservative Resurgence Gear
https://teespring.com/stores/conservative-resurgence-gear

The dilatory tactics of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer to keep the Senate impeachment trial going with constant demands for new witnesses and new evidence is intended to tarnish the president with the stain of impeachment “forever.” It will also give media the opportunity to prosecute Trump’s impeachment on CNN and MSNBC, and in the New York Times and Washington Post, for the purpose of turning the public against Trump and his reelection, no matter what happens in the Senate.

They know they cannot get a guilty verdict in the upper chamber, so they will strive mightily for a guilty verdict from the public with a new Christine Blasey Ford emerging daily; Lev Parnas is merely the first.

Like synchronized swimmers, Media heads will ask that day’s Julie Swetnick leading questions to get the answers they want -- something that wouldn’t be allowed in a court. The goal is to get the public to convict Trump despite the House prosecutors’ inevitable loss in the Senate.

The beauty of Dem/media’s ploy is that it doesn’t matter whether the Senate allows or disallows witnesses in the impeachment trial. If they can’t get Republicans to agree to witnesses, they will cry, “Coverup!” If there is additional testimony, Republican witnesses will be ignored by media with the expectation that many voters will not seek the truth.

Even so, some believe it might benefit McConnell and the Republicans to allow some prosecution witnesses as a tradeoff to getting testimony from defense witnesses such as Hunter Biden, “whistleblower” Ciaramella, Joe “Hands on Leadership” Biden, Schiff (I’ll take House Committee Chairmen for $100, Alex), ICIG Atkinson, and maybe even the prayerfully prating and effulgent Nancy Pelosi (complete with her “good Catholic” coruscating halo).

Exposing the whistleblower Ciaramella/Schiff/Atkinson conspiracy in the construction and submission of the complaint that precipitated impeachment has value even if media ignore it. The problem is Schiff, Ciaramella, and Atkinson can lie with impunity. They know there is zero chance of any repercussions. A Democrat can’t get arrested in this town (see Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, et al).

In naming Schiff as head prosecutor for the House, the always cagey Pelosi to some degree insulates him from being called as a witness. Nancy will paint it as a Republican dirty trick to call for his testimony and media will certainly echo that claim. The same goes should they seek testimony from her.

People have been questioning Speaker Pelosi’s strategy during the entire impeachment process. Schiff and Nadler’s hearings, filled with secondhand witnesses and hearsay evidence that wouldn’t hold up in any court, were an exercise in onanism more than an actual impeachment investigation.

Link to Article:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/only_trial_witnesses_can_expose_the_evil_antitrump_coup.html#.XiwRJPPWh9s.gmail


  AutoPlay Next Video